Intel is one of the two most popular companies developing processors for laptops and computers. Many gamers and other users consider this company to be the best and prefer its products. But Intel has a fairly wide range of models. So, figuring out which processor is best for which computer is sometimes not so easy. Especially to make it easier for customers to navigate wide range offers from the manufacturer, we have created a rating of Intel processors. With it you can easily choose the processor to suit your taste.
No. 10 – Intel Pentium G4400
Price: 5745 rubles
And our top chipset begins, called the Intel Pentium G4400 - an excellent option for budget personal computers.
This processor is based on the Skylake architecture and consists of two cores clocked at 3.3 GHz. Additional performance of the device is provided by cache memory, the volume of which here is 3072 KB.
The Pentium G4400 is also capable of image processing. There is a built-in SkylakeIntel HD Graphics 510 graphics processor. Of course, it cannot completely replace a full-fledged video card, but it is enough to perform simple tasks.
This model has a special controller that supports two-way data transfer between the processor and RAM.
This controller is capable of working with memory modules up to 64 GB. So there shouldn’t be any problems installing the required amount of RAM.
Intel Pentium G4400
No. 9 – Intel Pentium G4620
Price: 7085 rubles
The Intel Pentium G4620 is a dual-core processor with a clock frequency of 3700 MHz. It is developed using 14nm process technology. The basis of this device is the Kaby Lake architecture.
This model has the same cache memory - 3 MB, but the graphics processor here is slightly more powerful than the HD Graphics 630. Of course, if we compare the Pentium G4400 and G4620, then the latter option is better, but not much. It is unlikely that you will notice a significant difference in performance.
However, the G4620 is an excellent processor that, of course, is not suitable for professional gamers, but may well satisfy the needs of the average user or lover of playing old games.
In general, it will cope with new games, but there will be slowdowns, and it won’t be possible to set the settings to maximum. If this is not a problem for you, then the G4620 is worth taking. Otherwise, it’s better to take a closer look at more expensive models.
Intel Pentium G4620
No. 8 – Intel Core i3-8300
Price: 12955 rubles
Having finished with the budget segment, let's move on to entry-level processors. Intel Core i3-8300 is already a quad-core processor with a clock frequency of 3.7 GHz. The cache memory here is also twice as large – as much as 8 MB.
The Core i3-8300 comes with an excellent cooler, which is actually rare for powerful processors. Usually, when you buy a really good processor, you definitely need to buy a cooling system for it, because the basic one, as a rule, is terribly insufficient to maintain normal operating condition. But in this case, the box cooler copes with its task quite well.
The Core i3-8300 is a good processor that, in conjunction with an equally good video card, can handle most modern games.
In addition, it is sold for a meager price, considering all its advantages. So, if you do not need the most powerful, but high-quality chipset, we recommend choosing the i3-8300.
Intel Core i3-8300
No. 7 – Intel Core i3-8350K
Price: 13100 rubles
Intel Core i3-8350K is an improved version of the previous model. Like the basic version, it has four cores and 8 MB of cache, but its clock speed is 4 GHz.
This is a fairly high figure that is guaranteed to provide you with high performance. The main advantage of the Core i3-8350K over the Core i3-8300 is the unlocked multiplier.
That is, the processor can also be overclocked. Thus, the already high clock frequency of 4 GHz can be increased to 4.6 GHz. This is a pretty good overclocking for Intel processors.
The Intel Core i3-8350K maintains adequate temperatures well. When actively working with a computer, you are unlikely to heat it above 50 degrees, which is simply an excellent indicator.
Without a doubt, in the Intel model table, this is one of best processors in terms of price and quality ratio.
Intel Core i3-8350K
No. 6 – Intel Core i5-8400
Price: 16575 rubles
The golden mean in the company's lineup is occupied by Core i5 chipsets. It includes fairly current, but still affordable processors. We'll start our review with the Intel Core i5-8400.
It's a six-core processor clocked at just 2.8 GHz, but that's only in standard mode. In turbo boost, when maximum performance is required, it accelerates to 4 GHz. The cache memory here is 9 MB.
The i5-8400 processor is quite popular, because it has six ultra-fast cores and is sold at a very decent price compared to older models.
Overall, this is a more than decent processor. The only downside is that it has sudden temperature fluctuations, but usually it does not heat up above 61 degrees. This model is more than enough for any modern games.
Intel Core i5-8400
No. 5 – Intel Core i5-8600
Price: 18990 rubles
The improved sixth-generation Intel Core i5-8600 six-core processor has a significantly higher clock speed. The base frequency is 3.1 GHz, but in turbo mode this figure increases to 4.3 GHz. Otherwise, the technical specifications are the same.
The undoubted advantage of the Core i5-8600 is that in some cases its performance can be equal to even the newest processor models from Intel.
There is also very little heat generation, which is quite good for such a powerful chip. In short, the i5-8600 is an excellent representative of the mid-price segment that will provide you with maximum performance even in new games.
Intel Core i5-8600
No. 4 – Intel Core i5-9600K
Price: 21,750 rubles
The Intel Core i5-9600K, being the most advanced model in the line, has again advanced by increasing the clock frequency. Here this figure is 3.7 GHz. And when turbo mode is activated, the processor accelerates to an incredible 4.6 GHz.
Core i5-9600K is the best current processor from Intel today. Then there are models for those who are greedily trying to accumulate as much power as possible for the years to come.
When using an i5-9600K and a good video card, sufficient RAM and other adequate technical characteristics, you shouldn't have any performance issues with modern games.
Intel Core i5-9600K
No. 3 – Intel Core i7-8700K
Price: 23615 rubles
So we moved on to the most powerful Intel line - Core i7. We will begin our consideration with such a model as the Core i7-8700K. There are the same number of cores as in previous models - 6, and the maximum clock speed is the same.
But the i7-8700K has a significantly increased amount of cache memory - 12288 KB. Also, a more powerful graphics core HD Graphics 630 at 1200 MHz was installed here.
12 threads provide a significant power reserve, thanks to which the Intel Core i7-8700K will still be relevant long years forward. The fact that if you have the appropriate video card, all modern games will run even on ultra settings is probably not worth mentioning, this is already clear.
Intel Core i7-8700K
No. 2 – Intel Core i7-9700K
Price: 34299 rubles
The Intel Core i7-9700K processor is based on an architecture codenamed Coffee Lake-R. It has 8 cores and is created according to the 14 nm technical process standard. The clock frequency of the processor cores is 3.6 GHz, and the cache memory is 12 MB.
Essentially, the Core i7-9700K repeats the previous model, but already contains 8 cores and 16 threads, which further increases the processor's power reserves.
With such a processor, you can not only play, but stream modern games in good quality. There is also an unlocked multiplier and, as a result, the ability to overclock the cores.
The only problem is the very high price, but you have to pay a lot for the power.
Intel Core i7-9700K
No. 1 – Intel Core i9-7960X
Price: 113,030 rubles
Here we come to the first place where the Core i9-7960X is located - this is the best latest generation processor from Intel to date.
It costs three times more than the previous model, but this is more than justified, because there are as many as 16 cores operating at a clock frequency of 2.2 GHz. In turbo mode, it is possible to overclock the frequency to 4.2 GHz. It is supported by a 22 MB cache memory.
If you have a lot of money, you can buy this processor and not worry about your computer not being able to handle anything for many years to come. But if you only need modern games, you can choose something cheaper.
Intel Core i9-7960X
Above are the best processor models from Intel. Among them, you can easily choose an option that will suit your needs and financial capabilities, because all the chips presented here are the best solutions for their price.
Now smartphones can process a mountain of information if desired. Their processor power is enough to solve absolutely any problem. At the same time, modern chipsets consume a minimal amount of electricity, for which we should thank the improved technical process. Our rating of smartphone processors will tell you about the most powerful models. Devices based on them can be blamed for anything, but certainly not for lack of power!
Good to know!
Now the most famous companies in the mobile processor market are the following:
- Qualcomm- produces chipsets from the Snapdragon series;
- Samsung- creates Exynos chips;
- MediaTek- flagship processors are distributed under the Helio brand;
- Huawei- chipsets under the HiSilicon sub-brand are mainly built into their own smartphones.
At the same time, it is impossible to say exactly which chips are more powerful and which are weaker. Of course, there are all kinds of tests and benchmarks. But their result can be called conditional, hypothetical. In practice, each processor operates in its own mode, rarely raising clock speeds to maximum. And yet, our rating can be considered correct - the mobile processors left out of it suffer from certain shortcomings, and devices based on them cannot be called ideal.
Our top may not include recently announced models. We decided to talk only about those products whose smartphones are already on store shelves.
Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890
- Year of issue: 2016
- Technical process: 14 nm
- Architecture: Samsung Exynos M1 + ARM Cortex-A53 (ARMv8-A)
- Video accelerator: Mali-T880, 12 cores, 650 MHz
Geekbench result: 5940 points
If not the best processor for a smartphone, then at least one of those worthy of this title. It’s not for nothing that all variations of the South Korean Galaxy S7 are equipped with it. Is it possible to blame this flagship for lack of power? The chipset can easily handle 4K video at 60 fps. It consists of eight cores. The maximum frequency is 2290 MHz. But it rarely comes to raising it to such a level, since lower frequencies are quite enough to solve most problems.
Unfortunately, the processor also has certain problems. It just so happens that South Korean chipsets are not equipped with the best video accelerator (GPU). Here too, the Mali-T880, despite its 12 cores, performs strictly to the “good” rating, but nothing more. This is proven by tests in GFXBench, where in terms of graphics, the Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 is ahead of some other chipsets reviewed today.
Advantages
- Supports video in 2160p resolution at 60 frames/s;
- Not very hot;
- Low energy consumption;
- High scores in benchmarks.
Flaws
- The memory test does not show the best results;
- The graphics accelerator could perform better.
Samsung Galaxy S7, Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge, Samsung Galaxy Golden 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
- Year of issue: 2015
- Technical process: 14 nm FinFET
- Architecture: Qualcomm Kryo
- Video accelerator: Adreno 530, 624 MHz
Geekbench result: 4890 points
Qualcomm does not have its own production facilities. However, it has many patents at its disposal. And with them, developing a processor close to ideal is not difficult, after which all that remains is to place an order for production from other companies. Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 pleases with both computing power and graphics processing capabilities. Many flagships released in 2016 were equipped with this chipset. And none of their customers complained about the graphics in mobile games!
The chip consists of only four cores. However, this did not stop it from scoring record scores in benchmarks - not least thanks to the graphics accelerator. The maximum frequency of this processor is 2150 MHz. At the hardware level, the chipset supports HDMI 2.0, USB 3.0, and Bluetooth 4.1. In short, the processor could easily cope even with the tasks assigned to a laptop! It also features support for a camera with a resolution of up to 28 megapixels - which is why Sony chose this processor, whose flagship smartphones have just such a sensor.
Advantages
- Very high resolution camera support;
- Capable of processing Full HD video at up to 240 frames/s;
- Supports 10-bit 4K video;
- Windows devices use DirectX 11.2;
- Very high clock speed;
- Not very high energy consumption;
- High scores in benchmarks;
- The memory test leads to high results;
- Excellent performance in games.
Flaws
- Sometimes it gets quite hot.
The most popular smartphones: Motorola Moto Z Force, Elite X3, ASUS ZenFone 3, HTC 10, Samsung Galaxy S7, Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge, Sony Xperia X Performance, Sony Xperia XR, Xiaomi Mi5 Pro, ZTE Nubia Z11
HiSilicon Kirin 95
- Year of manufacture: 2016
- Technical process: 16 nm
- Architecture:
- Video accelerator: Mali-T880, 4 cores
Geekbench result: 6000 points
This chipset is manufactured using a 16-nanometer process technology, which indicates its decent energy efficiency. The maximum frequency here is increased to 2.5 GHz. The creators had to take this step because of the Mali-T880 graphics accelerator, which does not cope with its task in the best way.
The Chinese chipset consists of eight cores, four of which can be called auxiliary. Paired with a GPU, it is capable of playing 4K video at 60 fps. But the processor is only capable of playing back - independently creating video recordings - in 1080p resolution. And this despite the fact that the chip even supports dual cameras, the total resolution of which is 42 megapixels. It is also able to recognize Bluetooth 4.2 and USB 3.0 modules.
Advantages
- Supports many modern wireless technologies;
- Almost record clock speed;
- There are no big problems with overheating;
- Can decode 4K video at 60fps;
- Supports dual high definition cameras.
Flaws
- The graphics accelerator shows poor results.
The most popular smartphones: Huawei P9, Huawei P9 Plus, Huawei Honor V8, Huawei Honor Note 8.
HiSilicon Kirin 950
- Year of issue: 2015
- Technical process: 16 nm
- Architecture: 4x ARM Cortex-A72 + 4x ARM Cortex-A53
- Video accelerator: Mali-T880, 4 cores, 900 MHz
Geekbench result: 5950 points
In 2015-2016, this processor was used by many Huawei smartphones. The chipset consists of eight cores, the power of four of them can reach 2300 MHz. It would seem that the result is quite good. But not everything is so simple. The weak point of the chip is the graphics accelerator. The first version of Mali-T880 is used here. It copes well with video decoding - in theory, you can even run 4K video at 60 frames/s. But in games this GPU performs disgustingly, especially by flagship standards.
However, you can’t find fault with the computing power of this chipset, which is why it made it into our top processors. The product supports Bluetooth 4.2 and USB 3.0 standards, although the Chinese giant has not really produced smartphones with such high-speed interfaces, preferring to save money. Also, in theory, the processor copes with the data stream from a dual camera with a total resolution of 42 megapixels.
Advantages
- Supports USB 3.0 and Bluetooth 4.2;
- High computing power;
- Support for modern memory formats;
- Not very expensive to produce;
- Decodes high definition video;
- Capable of handling a dual 42-megapixel camera.
Flaws
- The graphics accelerator could be much better;
- Cannot provide the camera with 4K video recording.
The most popular smartphones: Huawei Honor 8, Huawei Honor Note 8, Huawei Mate 8, Huawei Honor V8.
Apple A9X APL1021
- Year of issue: 2015
- Technical process: 16 nm
- Architecture: Apple Twister 64-bit ARMv8-compatible
- Video accelerator: PowerVR Series 7X, 12 cores
Geekbench result : 5400 points
Why do game developers primarily focus on Apple smartphones and tablets? Is it really only their owners who can afford to buy a toy? No, everything is much simpler. This is the technique that games work best on. The Apple A9X APL1021 processor is equipped with an almost ideal graphics accelerator, which can solve absolutely any problem! If Apple wanted, it could even implement a 4K video recording feature at 60 frames per second!
As for computing power, everything is fine here, although the processor still does not score record scores in benchmarks. It would seem that only two cores are used here. But for solving everyday problems this is quite enough. Not least because of the better optimized operating system.
Advantages
- High power of two cores;
- Excellent 12-core graphics accelerator;
- Full support for 4K video at 60 fps;
- Support for many modern technologies;
- Recognizes modern memory formats.
Flaws
Apple iPad Pro
MediaTek MT6797 Helio X25
- Year of issue: 2016
- Technical process: 20 nm
- Architecture: 2x ARM Cortex-A72 + 4x ARM Coptex-A53 + 4x ARM Coptex-A53
- Video accelerator: Mali-T880MP4, 4 cores, 850 MHz
Geekbench result: 4920 points
A processor with a fairly complex structure. It consists of ten nuclei belonging to two varieties. The two cores are the most powerful - they belong to the Cortex-A72 type, and their clock speed can reach 2500 MHz. The remaining computing cores belong to the Cortex-A53 type. Moreover, half of them are overclocked to a frequency of 2000 MHz, while the rest are limited to 1550 MHz.
All this allows the processor to score a lot of points in benchmarks. And the result would have been even higher if not for the graphics accelerator. This element here is seriously limited in its capabilities. Yes, it supports full work with 4K video, including its creation, but only at 30 fps. And in games the GPU copes with its task even worse. As for other characteristics, we should highlight support for 32-megapixel cameras and the Bluetooth 4.1 standard. The maximum display resolution of a smartphone with such a chipset can reach 2560 x 1600 pixels.
Advantages
- Support for 32 MP camera;
- Very high computing power;
- Relatively low energy consumption;
- Although limited, there is support for 4K video;
- Low cost chipset.
Flaws
- The GPU performs poorly in games;
- No Bluetooth 4.2 support.
The most popular smartphones: Meizu Pro 6, Oukitel K6000 Premium, Xiaomi Redmi Pro, Zopo Speed 8, Vernee Apollo.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953
- Year of issue: 2016
- Technical process: 14 nm
- Architecture: ARM Cortex-A53 (ARMv8)
- Video accelerator: Adreno 506
Geekbench result: 4900 points
One of Qualcomm's most popular creations. It is endowed with a huge number of smartphones from the mid-budget and even top segments. The manufacturer did not bother with the architecture, giving the chipset eight identical cores. The maximum clock frequency is 2000 MHz, which is quite enough for the average user.
The graphics accelerator here is optimized for processing video content. Theoretically, a smartphone built on the basis of this processor is capable of playing and recording 4K video at 60 frames per second. But in games some problems begin. Although their presence is surprising, because the GPU even has support for DirectX 12, which is activated on devices with Windows on board. The chipset also supports a dual camera, the total resolution of which does not exceed 24 megapixels. The only thing missing here is USB 3.0 support. However, smartphone creators do not like to integrate such high-speed connectors into their creations.
Advantages
- Dual camera supported;
- Fast charging technology is well implemented;
- High power of all eight cores;
- Full support for 4K video content at 60 fps;
- Relatively low cost.
Flaws
- Camera resolution cannot exceed 24 megapixels;
- No Bluetooth 4.2 support;
- Display resolution cannot exceed 1920 x 1200 pixels;
- In games, the chipset does not perform well.
The most popular smartphones: Huawei G9 Plus, ASUS ZenFone 3, Fujitsu Easy, Huawei Maimang 5, Lenovo Vibe P2, Motorola Moto Z Play, Samsung Galaxy C7.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 620 APQ8076
- Year of issue: 2016
- Technical process: 28 nm
- Architecture: 4x ARM Cortex-A72 + 4x ARM Cortex-A53
- Video accelerator: Adreno 510
Geekbench result: 4886 points
This chipset is also known as the Snapdragon 652. It is one of the last processors that is still produced on the 28nm process. The creators are not at all embarrassed by the relatively large size of the chip, since it is built mainly into tablets.
The processor consists of eight computing cores. The clock frequency of four of them can reach 1800 MHz. This is quite enough for the tablet to solve basic tasks without any hesitation. The chipset also includes the Adreno 510 graphics accelerator. There are no special complaints about it, because no one will expect excellent graphics performance from the tablet. It should be noted that theoretically the chip supports video processing in 2160p resolution at 30 frames/s. It also boasts support for Bluetooth 4.1 and proprietary Quick Charge 3.0 fast charging technology.
Advantages
- Supports devices with high screen resolutions;
- Great computing power;
- Albeit limited, but still support for 4K video;
- Built-in fast charging technology.
Flaws
- No Bluetooth 4.2 support;
- Still not the best graphics accelerator.
Most popular devices: Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 Plus 8.0, Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 Plus 9.7.
MediaTek MT6797M Helio X20
- Year of issue: 2016
- Technical process: 20 nm
- Architecture: 2x ARM Cortex-A72 + 4x ARM Cortex-A53 + 4x ARM Cortex-A53
- Video accelerator: Mali-T880MP4, 4 cores, 780 MHz
Geekbench result: 5130 points
Many mobile processors have four or even eight cores. In the case of the MediaTek MT6797M Helio X20, their number has been increased to ten. As a result, the performance of the chipset is very high. Especially in applications that do not require serious graphics processing. It should be noted that only two computing cores are particularly powerful here - their clock frequency reaches 2300 MHz. The remaining nuclei are divided into two groups. One can please you with a frequency of 1850 MHz, while the other has this parameter fixed at 1400 MHz. But the result in any case is very good, which is confirmed by synthetic tests, and by the smartphones themselves - the interface on them does not slow down at all thanks to the chipset.
As for the graphics accelerator, everything is much worse here. Theoretically, it copes with viewing and recording 4K video at 30 frames per second. But in games you immediately feel a lack of power. Modern games will run on a smartphone with such a processor, but with simplified graphics. Especially if the device has a screen with Full HD resolution or higher. It should also be noted that the processor supports almost any mobile camera - as long as the module resolution does not exceed 32 megapixels.
Geekbench result: 4610 points
There are two versions of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 620 processor, also known as the Snapdragon 652. The first is the MSM8976, which was released in 2015. A year later, a slightly more improved version was released - APQ8076, which was received by some Samsung tablets. The products are practically no different from each other. They have eight cores, half of which are capable of increasing the frequency to 1800 MHz. Both processors are equipped with a far from ideal Adreno 510 graphics accelerator.
Qualcomm's creation is capable of supporting smartphones whose display has a resolution of no higher than 2560 x 1600 pixels. As for the camera, it is possible to process data coming from a dual module, the total resolution of which does not exceed 21 megapixels. Everything is fine with the module and its capabilities for processing data coming from dual-channel LPDDR3 memory.
Advantages
- High performance;
- View 4K video at 30 fps;
- Theoretical possibility of recording video in 1080p and 120 frames/s;
- Not very high cost;
- Dual camera support;
- Screen resolution can reach 2560 x 1600 pixels.
Flaws
- Bluetooth 4.2 is not supported;
- The maximum camera resolution cannot be very high.
The most popular smartphones: Vivo X6S A, Vivo X7, Vivo X7 Plus, LeEco Le2, G5 SE, Oppo R9 Plus, Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), ZTE Nubia Z11 Max, Xiaomi Mi Max
This material will compare the processor products of two leading manufacturers of semiconductor chips: Intel vs AMD. Their current computing platforms will also be reviewed, their strengths and weak sides. Well, in addition to this, possible computer configurations will be given.
The main current x86 processor sockets
Today, each of the leading manufacturers of central processors has 2 current processor sockets. At Intel it is:
Socket LGA 2011-v3. This combined processor socket is aimed at assembling both high-performance personal computers for computer enthusiasts and servers. The key feature of this platform is the RAM controller, which can operate in 4-channel mode, and it is this important feature that provides unprecedented performance to processor products. It should also be noted that this platform does not use an integrated graphics subsystem. Only discrete graphics can unlock the potential of such high-performance chips, and the LGA 2011 - v3 processor socket is aimed precisely at using this class of computer components.
Socket LGA 1151. This computing platform allows you to organize both budget-level PCs and high-performance computing systems. In this case, the RAM controller can operate maximally in 2-channel mode. Also, almost every central processor in LGA 1151 is equipped with an integrated video card that will fit perfectly into an office or budget system unit. In terms of performance, this socket is inferior to the previously reviewed LGA 2011-v3, but outperforms any of the AMD solutions. Therefore, if we compare Intel i5 vs AMD FX-8XXX, then the advantage, both in productivity and in energy efficiency, will be with the products of the first company.
In turn, AMD is actively promoting the following processor sockets today:
The main computing platform for this developer of microprocessor devices is AM3+. The most productive CPUs within its framework are FX chips, which can include from 4 to 8 computing modules. The RAM controller in AM3+, as in LGA 1151, can function at its maximum in only in this case we are talking about support for the outdated RAM standard - DDR3, but LGA 1151 boasts support for the newest and fastest DDR4. Therefore, if we compare the latest Intel i5 vs AMD FX-9XXX, then even the flagship solutions of the latter will significantly lose in performance. Also within this platform there is support for an integrated graphics subsystem. But, unlike the sameLGA 1151The built-in graphics core in this case is part of the motherboard, and is not integrated into the semiconductor chip of the CPU.
The most recent AMD processor socket to date isFM2+. Its main niche is inexpensive multimedia stations, office or ultra-budget computers. main featureFM2+ -This is a very productive integrated subsystem, which in terms of performance can compete on equal terms with entry-level discrete video cards and is significantly ahead of Intel products of this class. But the limiting factor on the success of this socket is the weak processor part of this semiconductor solution. Therefore, the use of this connector in the context of even an entry-level is entirelyunjustified.
LGA 1151. Main characteristics
This computing platform currently occupies a dominant position in the desktop computer market, and it is this platform that provides a significant advantage in Intel comparison vs AMD on the first side. And both in quantitative and qualitative terms. As noted earlier, it boasts the following advantages over its direct competitors AM3+ and FM2+: a built-in DDR4 RAM controller, the mandatory presence of a graphics subsystem and cache memory, which includes three levels without fail. The positioning of chips within LGA 1151, as well as their most important parameters, are shown in Table 1. If we make a direct comparison between Intel Core i5 vs AMD FX-9 XXX series, then in the vast majority of tasks the advantage will be with the first solution. There is nothing special about this: the latest generation of Intel chips was introduced in the summer of 2015, and AMD in 2012. Therefore, it is quite difficult for the latter’s processor products to compete with newer and more productive Intel products.
Positioning of chips within LGA 1151. Their most important characteristics
Name of processors | In which PCs is it best to use such a chip? | Main settings |
Celeron. CPU models G3920, G3900 and G3900TE. | Office system units with integrated graphics. | Advanced 14 nm process technology, excellent energy efficiency, three-level cache. |
Pentium. Model series processors G44XX and G45XX. | Budget PCs that can handle most common tasks. | Compared to the most affordable Celeron chips Level 3 cache and clock speeds have been increased. |
Core i3 models 61ХХ and 63ХХ. | Basic gaming PCs paired with powerful discrete graphics. | HT technology support, which allows you to get at the level With ofta 4 software processing streams. Increased L3 cache and clock speeds. |
Core i5 models 64XX, 65XX and 66XX. | An average gaming system or graphics station combined with a powerful graphics card. | Full 4 cores, dynamic CPU frequency control, even larger cache size. |
Core i7 models 67XX. | The most productive gaming PCs, video processing and encoding stations, entry-level servers. | 4 cores and 8 software processing threads. Maximum cache size. Adjusting the processor frequency. |
System units for computer enthusiasts. | An unlocked multiplier allows you to significantly increase the speed of your computing system. |
Processor socket LGA 2011-v3. Technical Specifications
Within this platform it is impossible to compare Intel vs AMD for the reason that this socket is unrivaled in performance today.LGA 2011-v3was originally developed as a server socket, but then a range of chipsXeon was supplemented Core i7,aimed at the segment of household PCs with unprecedented high performance.As was previously noted earlier, one cannot expect integrated graphics within such systems, and the RAM controller has 4 channels at once. Also, the undeniable advantages of this socket include the ability to install a CPU with 6 or even 12 cores, which also haveunlockedfactor. As a result, the productivity margin of such computing systems allows their owners will certainly not have to think about hardware requirements for the next 3-4 years. Intel vs AMD processors in context LGA 2011-v3comparison is unacceptable. There is simply a gap between them both in performance and in price. The latter for such PCs starts from several thousand dollars. But there is nothing special about this: such a PC is purchased several years in advance and has excessive performance.
Main parameters and features
It's not entirely correct to compare Intel Core vs AMD processor solutions FX.While the former are constantly updated and improved, the latter were released back in 2012 and since then there have been no changes within the AM3+ platform. As a result, the performance difference is simply huge.between these two platforms. AMD's flagship today can compete on equal terms only with the chips of the model rangeCore i3.All AM3+ processors have an unlocked multiplier, and, as a result, they can and should be overclocked. Under the most favorable circumstances, with such CPUs you can reach the 5 GHz bar. Also, this semiconductor crystal necessarily includes a 3-level cache. RAM controller in in this case 2-channel, but, unlikeLGA 1151can't work with memoryDDR4 but only with DDR3.When compared with each other“ Core ” last generation, then the advantage of the latter in terms of performance will be very large.The approximate positioning of AM3+ chips in niches is given in the table below.
AM3+ chip positioning
Processor family name | Number of cores and modules | Purpose |
FX-43XX | 4/2 | Budget and office PCs. Entry-level gaming systems. |
FX-63XX | 6/3 | Mid-level gaming computers |
FX-83XX | 8/4 | Graphics and workstations. Entry-level servers. The most productive gaming PCs within this platform. |
FX-9XXX | 8/4 | Computers for enthusiasts. |
Processor socket FM2+. The main platform for AMD hybrid chips
It is impossible to compare processor parts vs AMD A-series. These processors are aimed at solving completely different problems. The first of them allow you to create high-performance PCs, and the second - multimedia stations. But the situation changes dramatically when comparing graphics subsystems. Core i5, alas, cannot boast of a powerful integrated graphics subsystem, but the AMD hybrid chip is equipped by default with a video card, which even surpasses entry-level discrete accelerators in its capabilities. Important feature This family of chips is that they are equipped only with a two-level cache memory.
Multimedia stations
Of course, within the niche of multimedia stations, it is possible to compare central processors such as Intel Core i5 vs AMD A10-ХХХХ, but this approach is not economically justified. Such computers place increased demands on the graphics subsystem, and are not so demanding on the processor part of the PC. It is precisely this combination of characteristics that the previously mentioned series of hybrid chips from AMD can boast of. Another important feature is their very low cost, which corresponds to 2-core CPU models from Intel. As a result, AMD occupies a dominant position in this highly specialized niche. The approximate configuration of such a PC is shown in the table below. The parameters of this computer will be quite sufficient for playing videos, listening to music, working in office applications, and even some toys will run on it at minimum settings.
Approximate configuration of a multimedia station
№ p/p | Name of components | Model | Cost, rubles |
CPU | A8-7850 3.6/3.9 GHz, 4 cores, 4 MB L2 cache. | 5000 rubles |
|
Motherboard | MSI A78M-E35 | 3000 rubles |
|
RAM | TEAM 8 GB DDR3 1600 MHz | 2000 rubles |
|
power unit | GameMax GM-500B | 1200 rubles |
|
Frame | I-BOX FORCE 1807 | 900 rubles |
|
HDD | HDD 1 Tb 7200 | 2500 rubles |
|
Total: | 14600 rubles |
||
Office computers
In this case, the comparison between AMD FX vs Intel will be on the side of the latter. It has very productive entry-level CPUs at very affordable prices. The Celeron chip will look most optimal within such a computing system. The approximate configuration of such a computer is given in the following table.
Office computer 2016
№p/p | PC component | Model | Approximate price, rubles |
CPU | Celeron G3900 | 2100 rubles |
|
Motherboard | ASUS H110M-R/C/SI | 2400 rubles |
|
RAM | Silicon Power 4 GB DDR4 2133 MHz | 1200 rubles |
|
power unit | Delux 400W FAN 120 mm | 700 rubles |
|
Frame | Frime 165B | 900 rubles |
|
HDD | WD WD1600AVVS, 160 GB | 2200 rubles |
|
Total: | 9500 rubles |
||
Entry-level gaming PCs
Theoretically, within the framework of an entry-level gaming PC, you can also compare, for example, AMD FX - 6300 vs Intel Core AI 3. But the difference in performance in this case will be simply fantastic. Moreover, the winner will be the second CPU, which has only 2 real modules for carrying out calculations instead of the one that has 6 paired blocks.
Therefore, in any case, the gaming system should be based on chips from Intel. They are more expensive, but their performance is significantly better. Well, for gaming systems, the number of displayed images per second comes first, and here the difference between AMD FX vs Intel i3 will be simply stunning. The approximate configuration of such a computer is shown in the table below.
Basic gaming system components
№ p/p | PC component | Model | Price, rubles |
CPU | i3-6100 | 6500 rubles |
|
Motherboard | ASUS H110M | 2400 rubles |
|
RAM | 2x 4 GB DDR4 2133 MHz | 2400 rubles |
|
power unit | GameMax GM-500B | 1200 rubles |
|
Frame | I-BOX FORCE 1805 | 900 rubles |
|
HDD | 1Tb 7200 | 2 7 00 rubles |
|
Solid State Drive | 128 GB SATA 3 | 2500 rubles |
|
Video card | Radeon RX460 | 7000 rubles |
|
Total: | 25,600 rubles |
||
Average gaming systems
Comparing AMD FX-8350 vs Intel "Cor AI 5" even on a mid-level gaming PC in terms of the number of frames per second output, we get a significant difference. In some cases the difference will be 20-30 frames per second. This is unacceptable in dynamic games. Therefore, it is most correct to assemble a mid-level gaming system only on a full-fledged 4-core CPU from Intel. Moreover, it is best to look towards the i5-6600 chip. It is in combination with the GeForce 1060 that it will allow you to get excellent “Gameplay”. It should be noted that the video card must be equipped with 6GB of RAM. Also, installing processors with an unlocked multiplier in such a system is not entirely justified. They are aimed at the premium segment and to work in tandem with a more expensive and powerful video card. Otherwise, the approximate configuration is shown in the table below.
Mid-range gaming system
Component | Parameters, model | Price, rubles |
CPU | i5-6600 | 15 000 rubles |
Motherboard | ASUS In 150-M | 6000 rubles |
RAM | DDR4 3200MHz 16Gb | 12000 rubles |
power unit | 1000W | 7000 rubles |
Frame | Midi-Tower | 2000 rubles |
HDD | 2GB, 7200 | 6000 rubles |
SSD drive | 256GB | 5500 rubles |
Graphics accelerator | GeForce 1060, 6 GB | 20 000 rubles |
Total: | 73,500 rubles |
|
Uncompromising gaming PCs
If even when comparing Intel Core i5 vs AMD the undeniable advantage is already on the side of the first company, then in this case, in essence, the second company has no analogues. For the last 5 years, the premium CPU segment has been confidently occupied by the products of only one company - Intel, and even a comparison of AMD FX-9590 vs Intel LGA 2011-v3 does not give any chance to the products of the first company. As noted earlier, Core i7 processors for the LGA2011-v3 socket are aimed at this niche. They can include up to 10 computational units, have an increased amount of cache memory and an unlocked multiplier.
But the key difference in this case is the RAM controller, capable of operating in 4-channel mode. As a result, the RAM subsystem in this case is faster, and worthy competition for such computers does not yet exist.
PC for the computer enthusiast
Component | Characteristics | Price, rubles |
CPU | Core i7-6950 X | 100,000 rubles |
Video card | 8 GB | 50,000 rubles |
RAM | 32 GB, DDR4 | 25 000 rubles |
Motherboard | X99 | 45,000 rubles |
power unit | 1000 W | 16,000 rubles |
Frame | ATX | 2000 rubles |
HDD | 2Gb, 7200 | 8,000 rubles |
SSD drive | 512 GB | 10,000 rubles |
Total: | 256,000 rubles |
|
Graphic stations
Even within this specialized niche, a comparison between AMD FX vs Intel Core i5 indicates that the first company's products are outdated and inferior in all respects. The base chip for such a PC is i5-6400.
The approximate configuration of such a system is given in the following table.
Graphics station equipment
№ p/p | Component | Model | Cost in rubles |
CPU | i5-6400 | 11 000 rubles |
|
Motherboard | ASUS Z-170DE | 5400 rubles |
|
RAM | DDR4 16Gb | 10,000 rubles |
|
power unit | Aerocool VX-800 | 5400 rubles |
|
Frame | Frime 165B | 2000 rubles |
|
HDD | 1Tb SATA 3, 7200, 64 Mb cache | 40 00 rubles |
|
Solid State Drive | 256 GB SATA 3 | 50 00 rubles |
|
Video card | Radeon Pro2DUO | 120,000 rubles |
|
Total: | 162,800 rubles |
||
What's next?
The next few months will be very busy in the processor market. First, in January, Intel will update its lineup of chips and present the 7th generation of its architecture, codenamed Core. No fundamental changes are expected in this case. We will work on bugs, slightly improve performance and add some new technologies. Then, towards the end of the first quarter, AMD will finally release its new socket, which it will call AM4. In this case, the changes will already be revolutionary in nature. The chips will be produced using a new technical process, have an improved architecture and will feature new technologies. It is these Zen processors that will, in theory, restore parity in the CPU market. Only after this will it be advisable to revise the previously given computer configurations.
Results
Let us summarize the comparison of Intel vs AMD processor products carried out within the framework of this material. The only niche where the second company’s position is still strong is multimedia systems and PCs for budget and office use. Moreover, in the second case, Intel products look even more preferable. Another advantage that AMD can boast of is the lower cost of its products. But is it worth saving the same $100 and getting an outdated system?even by today's standards. This is already obvious: a PC is bought for 3-5 years, so in all other cases, when buying a new computer system, it is more correct to focus on comparisonspecifically for the products of the second company.
Vacations are in full swing, but the weather outside is not very good. What would you do with this? I suggest you spend time with pleasure: play computer games. Is your “old man” not up to modern toys? Maybe, . But which one?
Today's article is designed to help you decide on the choice of “pebble” for your gaming PC. The rating of the best processors as of mid-summer 2017 included models that showed the optimal balance in terms of performance and price. For your convenience, we have divided them into 3 groups: costing approximately $100, approximately $200 and approximately $300. So that no one feels left out, each group consists of a pair of processors - one Intel and one AMD.
Around $100: Intel Core i3-7100 and AMD FX-8320
Intel Core i3-7100
Yes, it has only 2 cores, but this drawback is compensated by a high clock frequency (3900 Mhz), support for DDR4-2400 memory and, to some extent, Hyper Threading technology, which allows the operating system to use each physical core as 2 logical ones. In addition, the “pebble” has good built-in graphics with support for 4k resolution at 60 Hz. Thanks to it, you will be able to do without a discrete video card if for some reason you put off purchasing one.
Specifications
- Microarchitecture: Kaby Lake (7th generation).
- Number of cores: 2.
- Clock frequency: 3900 Mhz.
- Socket: LGA1151.
- Process technology: 14 nm.
- Multiplier: 34, unlocked.
- L1 cache: 64 Kb (instructions + data).
- L2 cache: 512 Kb.
- L3 cache: 3072 Kb.
- PCI Express controller: yes.
- Technologies: Hyper Threading, EM64T (x64 support), Virtualization Technology (virtualization), Enhanced SpeedStep (power saving), hardware encryption, XD Bit, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSSE3, VT-x,MMX.
- Thermal power (TDP): 51 W.
- : 100 °C
The most attractive qualities of the Core i3-7100: high performance, reasonable price, integrated graphics and low TDP - the small cooler included in the kit is enough to cool the processor even under maximum load.
Disadvantage – it only works on Windows 10 (as well as Linux and Mac OS). Those who just can’t part with the “seven” and “eight” will have to choose – either the system or a new processor. By the way, this drawback applies not only to the Intel Core i3-7100, but to the entire Kaby Lake and AMD Ryzen line.
AMD FX-8320
8 cores, 4000 Mhz frequencies with the ability to increase to 4600 Mhz or more due to overclocking by a multiplier (here, unlike its competitor Intel, it is free), as well as support for DDR3-1866 memory perform well in multi-threaded games like Battlefield.
Specifications
- Microarchitecture: Vishera.
- Number of cores: 8.
- Clock frequency: 3500-4000
- Socket: AM3+.
- Technological process: 32 nm.
- Multiplier: 17.5, free.
- Integrated graphics: no.
- L1 cache: 96 Kb.
- L2 cache: 2048 Kb.
- L3 cache: 8192 Kb.
- PCI Express controller: no.
- Maximum supported memory size: 128 GB.
- Supported memory standards: DDR3-800/1066/1333/1600/1866. There is ECC support.
- Technologies: AMD64 (x64 support), Virtualization Technology, AMD PowerNow (noise reduction), Turbo Core 3.0 (increasing frequency during peak loads), NX Bit, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4, SSE1, SSE4.2, SSSE3, MMX, VT, XOP, TBM.
- Thermal power (TDP): 125 W.
Advantages of the AMD FX-8320: high performance, reasonable price ($115-120), the multiplier makes it possible to build an inexpensive gaming computer that will remain relevant for the next 3-4 years.
Disadvantages: very hot - requires a powerful cooling system, consumes a lot of energy, does not have a graphics core.
About $200: Intel Core i5-7500 and AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Intel Core i5-7500
The clock frequency of this processor reaches 3800 Mhz (or a little more) with dynamic overclocking, there is built-in video - the same as the i3-7100, and support for DDR4-2400 memory.
Specifications
- Microarchitecture: Kaby Lake.
- Number of cores: 4.
- Clock frequency: 3400-3800
- Socket: LGA1151.
- Process technology: 14 nm.
- Multiplier: 39, unlocked.
- Built-in graphics: HD Graphics 630.
- Graphics core frequency: 1100 Mhz.
- L2 cache: 1024 Kb.
- L3 cache: 6144 Kb.
- PCI Express controller: yes.
- Number of PCI Express 3.0 lanes: 16.
- Maximum supported memory size: 64 GB.
- Supported memory standards: DDR3L-1333/1600, DDR4-2133/2400.
- Technologies: Turbo Boost0 (increasing frequency during peak loads), EM64T, Virtualization Technology, Enhanced SpeedStep, Intel vPro (remote computer control outside the OS), hardware encryption, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4a , SSSE3, MMX, TBT 2.0, VT-x, XD Bit.
- Maximum temperature: 80 °C
Advantages of the Intel Core i5-7500: fast, cool (TDP 65 W), supports dynamic overclocking (Turbo Boost 2.0), has built-in graphics, and the Intel vPro function is implemented. The latter allows you to remotely edit the BIOS and run diagnostic tests outside the operating system by connecting to your computer over the network.
Disadvantages - no support for the universally beloved Windows 7, no hyperthreading, locked multiplier (at this price, as many believe, they could implement Hyper Threading and make multiplication free).
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Processors based on the Zen microarchitecture, one of which is the Ryzen 5 1600, are characterized by low power consumption and TDP (which is unusual for the bulk of AMD products). In addition, the boxed model includes a compact, efficient and quiet cooler, the power of which is sufficient even with some overclocking.
Specifications
- Number of cores: 6.
- Clock frequency: 3200-3600 Mhz.
- Socket: AM4.
- Process technology: 14 nm.
- Multiplier: 32, free.
- Integrated graphics: no.
- L1 cache: 96 Kb.
- L2 cache: 3072 Kb.
- L3 cache: 16384 Kb.
- PCI Express controller: yes.
- Number of PCI Express 3.0 lanes: 16.
- Maximum supported memory size: 64 GB.
- Supported memory standards: DDR4-1866/2666.
- Technology support: multithreading, AMD64, virtualization, hardware encryption, Precision Boost (increasing clock cycles during peak loads), Pure Power (energy saving), SSE instructions, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4a, SSSE3, MMX .
- Thermal power (TDP): 65 W.
Pros of AMD Ryzen 5 1600: excellent performance at a moderate price ($200-210), low heating, low power consumption, overclocking, the ability to unleash the potential of any modern video card.
Cons: no integrated graphics, no Windows support 7.
Around $300: Intel Core i7-7700K and AMD Ryzen 7 1700
Intel Core i7-7700K
Specifications
- Microarchitecture: Kaby Lake.
- Number of cores: 4.
- Clock frequency: 4200-4500
- Socket: LGA1151.
- Process technology: 14 nm.
- Multiplier: 42, free.
- Built-in graphics: HD Graphics 630.
- Graphics core frequency: 1150 Mhz.
- L1 cache: 128 Kb (instructions + data).
- L2 cache: 1024 Kb.
- L3 cache: 8192 Kb.
- PCI Express controller: yes.
- Number of PCI Express 3.0 lanes: 16.
- Maximum supported memory size: 64 GB.
- Supported memory standards: DDR3L-1333-1600, DDR4-2133-2400.
- Technologies supported: Hyper-Threading, Turbo Boost0, EM64T, Virtualization Technology, Enhanced SpeedStep, hardware encryption, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSSE3, MMX, XD Bit.
- Thermal power (TDP): 91 W.
- Maximum temperature: 100 °C
Strengths of the Intel Core i7-7700K: the best ratio of performance in games and purchase costs ($300-315), unlocked multiplier, high-performance video core. In short, a good foundation for the future.
Weaknesses: in case of overclocking, it requires a powerful, expensive cooling system; it does not support Windows 7.
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
“Under the hood” of this processor: 8 physical and 16 virtual cores, a free multiplier, 16 Mb L3, support for DDR4-2933, 24 PCI Express lanes (competitors have 16), the frequency of each core in dynamic overclocking is 3700 MHz, when overclocked by the multiplier – up to approximately 4100 MHz. There is no built-in video card, but the systems for which the Ryzen 7 1700 is intended do not need it. Besides, he's cold. Even under intense load (by the way, it is extremely difficult to load it 100%), it does not heat above 50 °C.
The cost of the model is comparable to the Core i7-7700K.
Specifications
- Microarchitecture: Summit Ridge (Zen).
- Number of cores: 8.
- Clock frequency: 3000-3700 MHz.
- Socket: AM4.
- Process technology: 14 nm.
- Multiplier: 30, free.
- Integrated graphics: no.
- L1 cache: 256 Kb (instructions + data).
- L2 cache: 4096 Kb.
- L3 cache: 16384 Kb.
- PCI Express controller: yes.
- Number of PCI Express 3.0 lanes: 24.
- Maximum supported memory size: 64 GB.
- Supported memory standards: DDR4-1866/2933.
- Technology support: multithreading, AMD64, virtualization, hardware encryption, Precision Boost, Pure Power, SSE instructions, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4a, SSSE3, MMX.
- Thermal power (TDP): 65 W.
- Maximum temperature: 90 °C
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700: amazing power, multitasking, versatility, energy efficiency. The disadvantage is that there is no support for older versions of Windows.
According to many owners and experts, the Ryzen 7 1700 is AMD’s huge leap forward. The release of this processor showed that the “reds” are far from being as hopelessly behind as they are thought to be, and are still capable of giving the “blues” a hard time. As they say, they harness for a long time, but go quickly.
